🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare that with what the typical American pays. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.